Hello Plainfield. I'll need a few minutes to address the ignorance and arrogance of the "Minister of Information" -- the famous Dan Damon. You are a talented writer indeed but instead of using that tool to bring people together you spend most of your time trying to tear people down.
- To the Man in the Arena-
It is not the critic who counts, nor the man who points how the strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly...who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at best, knows the triumph of high achievement; and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
--Teddy Roosevelt--
Dan, I really don't what happened in your life for you to become such a pathetic soul. When we met yesterday at the debate you looked real uncomfortable being in such close proximity to someone whose character you had unjustifiably attacked. I will not have my integrity and intelligence questioned by a disgruntled frustrated old man whose biggest contribution to our community is critcizing others. Your recent post not only tries to demean me it also belittles the contributions and comments of Deborah Dowe at the debate. During the debate she exemplified nothing but class and intelligence in my opinion. There are other candidates other than Mr. Storch to be considered here. If you think his record and performance in our community warrants his reelection, vote for him.
The residents of the 2nd ward are entitled to be given a fair representation of all the candidates views. They are tired of yellow journalism. They want results and that's why we have elections to change course and get somebody new into office when they are not satisfied. What are you afraid of? I think all that attended can attest to the fact that all candidates, including your pick Mr. Storch, were insightful and presented themselves well. But to you Tony Rucker was just a babbling idiot and Deborah Dowe was just good for a joke and occasional laugh. Cory could have said he was for building a landfill downtown and he still would have been your pick. So let's cut through the B.S. and ask why is that? Cory is going to have to earn this seat just like the rest of us, based upon his vision and his record. I know he has to be embarrassed by your piece. I hope he publicly comes out and distances himself from your rhetoric. Matter of fact I think that's a good idea, Cory when you read this post issue a statement on your blog condemning this lowering of the bar when it comes to public dialogue. Dan you're one of the reasons people get turned off by the process.
Let's revisit yesterday Dan. After the debate we were talking and I called Cory over to make he knew exactly where I stood on this accusation over his signs disappearing. So all three of us are standing there in a mini-huddle outside the conference room. I turn to you Dan and look you dead in your face then glance toward Cory with my hand on his shoulder and stated man to man I would never dishonor myself by pulling or having someone else pull signs out of someones yard. When Cory turned to you all I heard out of your mouth was a bunch of stammering.
Now let's take a look at your May 31st posting.
First on the Park Hotel. Yes this is Cory's field. Prior to this being an election issue Cory hasn't brought forward any solutions concerning this facility. He said he has been there many times. What suggestion has he ever brought forward for public debate? It doesn't take an expert to suggest something be done about mentally challenged people having to sit on 95 degree pavement in a parking lot. And anyone who has driven by there can see that.
Let's talk about why Cory is a no-brainer pick for council because of his experience on the planning board. Cory is in the very unique position of getting 2 bites at the apple. 1st when he votes as the council's sitting member on the planning board. 2nd when he votes as part of the governing body on the council. With all these development proposals has he once insisted that things like impact fees are part of any deal to ensure that the taxpayers of Plainfield don't get left holding the bag. Or that developers should be required to hire a percentage of Plainfield residents if they are qualified to work on the project. Did you mention that he voted yes to override zoning laws on the books to allow for a variance to place high density housing projects near some of our most treasured neighborhoods?
You were impressed by his insistence that the complete rail corridor needs to be developed. For your information our rail corridor is one of the last bastions of commercially zoned areas in this city. Once we loose it to residential development its gone forever. But the associated costs of that residential housing will be with us until the end of time. Do you know an additional 250 school-aged children costs this city 3.25 Million dollars? Which one of you two are going to pay for that? Siding with developers whose only care is to turn a profit is not what I see as good governance. Slapping the 'in need of development' designation may not be a big deal for you Dan, but for businesses they know that is just another step closer to the words eminent domain.
In your post, when I say something "I'm pitching an idea." When Cory says something he brings a wealth of experience to the table. On my idea of having a technology center downtown excuse me for not bringing the signed agreement with me to the debate last night. I'm currently not the councilperson. I think its a great idea. I've actually worked to create facilities like this while I was a Investment Advisor with Merrill Lynch. This project is something Cory should be a champion for, especially with his 6 years of experience on the school board. So let me get this straight you want me to negotiate with these "possible players" as a private citizen. Wow. What resolutions has Cory sponsored to advance the lives of the children our community during his tenure?
And yes Dan I do understand the budget process thank you. Do you know that the current way our departments determine how much money they have spent is to compare year over year numbers? Do you know that the city has no way of producing real-time line item expenditure costs on a ongoing basis? Because of this it make monitoring fiscal year spending almost impossible.
When it comes to 'outsiders' I made it perfectly clear at the debate that I thought it was a conflict of interest to have Jennifer Wenson-Maier at the position of Director of Economic Development for Plainfield considering he role as President of the Rahway City Council. Nothing personal against her. If you or Mr. Storch think that is a good idea for Plainfield you have the right to that opinion.
Dan, as far Plainfield's historical position of RCA's (the program where Plainfield received a one time allotment for accepting a affordable housing unit from another city)I advise you to know you facts before you run your mouth. As a matter of fact the Assembly just revisited that legislation earlier this year and for the record I will never waste another second responding to you again.
Plainfield. I'm interested in moving our city forward. I know how to get things done and I'm not afraid to speak the truth and confront the obstacles of stupidity, arrogance and ignorance no matter where it comes from. As your councilman you will know where I stand on the issues. As councilman of the 2nd ward you will see me on a regular basis holding town hall meetings to ensure that your concerns are known and understood. If I think something is bad for our city I'll respectfully vote no. That's every councilpersons responsibility. We have a Latin saying in the Marine Corps called "Sempre Fidelis" always faithful. If I am given the privilege to serve as you Councilman whether you live in the Crescent Historic District or Sleepy Hollow I will never forget my first obligation is to represent the concerns and interests of the residents of the 2nd ward. There are many things that are beyond my control but when it comes to effective leadership, I know I can deliver on that.
--Tony Rucker--
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Solutions to our Code enforcement dilema.
Plainfield's housing stock is one of its greatest assets. Code enforcement and the Inspection division although talked about in the same conversation really have two distinct roles. The inspection process is part of selling and buying a home. Most homeowners are required to get an inspection by their financier. Code Enforcement relates more to existing home owners or rental units, apart from the transaction process.
So when it came to improving Plainfield's system I thought it was a good idea to speak with a municipality with a platform that is both efficient and effective. So I made it a point to have a conversation with the Chief inspector of New Brunswick, NJ. I chose New Brunswick because it has suburban and urban parts that make up their town just like Plainfield. In addition, I spoke with many of Plainfield's own inspectors to get their input on the matter. They all agreed that Plainfield needs to change the current code on the books and reduce the multitude of items the seller is required to complete before the certificate of compliance can be issued. The code should require that the subject property is safe to live in and is structurally sound. This would speed up the transaction process and free up our inspectors to go after the real violators of code enforcement. As your councilman, I would push for an ordinance to change the current code on the books, effectively limiting the scope and responsibilities of the inspectors. This solution is good for investors as well as home buyers and sellers.
Last night I stated my support for increasing the numbers of code enforcement inspectors. My opponent thinks we don't need more inspectors. I disagree. I stand behind my position and here's why. When it comes to code enforcement the department is woefully understaffed. When it comes to things like stacking, overcrowding and unauthorized building and maintenance we need more resources to enforce the rules that protect the integrity of our community. We have had multiple fires because of these unchecked violations. Imagine if you live on a quiet street in the Sleepy Hollow area. Your neighbor moves and rents their old house to a very nice family. At first all is well. Then violations begin to mount. Excessive trash makes it obvious that too many people are now occupying that dwelling. Who do you call for this kind of problem? The code enforcement division, but due to their lack of manpower they can't stay on top of things like this and believe me this is occurring all across the city. Cable wires running out of windows supplying Comcast to the multiple dwellings that have been created in one single family home. Sometimes I ask myself does anyone else notice this or is it just me?
Guess what happens when we don't have the necessary manpower to enforce our own rules, homeowners get to a point where they can't take it anymore and move. This causes a ripple effect throughout that neighborhood because the property value of the remaining homeowner is now reduced. Now the remaining homeowners either deal with the new eyesore or pack up and leave themselves. Property taxes in some areas of our community are between 10-20k. Even if your not a homeowner code enforcement rules are there to protect the quality of life for those who rent as well. But homeowners are not going to live next to an eyesore paying those kind of taxes. If you think it can't happen in your neighborhood think again. Many of our seniors who can no longer afford to continue to pay our higher than ever taxes are moving and using their old homes for rental income.
In closing, properly staffed divisions is key to unit effectiveness. We need to change the mission of these divisions and redirect them away from homeowners with minor violations and focus on overt violators of the law. We need to incorporate technology to make these divisions both more effective and efficient which was a part of my campaign platform from day one. I think these changes will allow our municipal employees to satisfy the true mission of both the Code and Inspections divisions for the City of Plainfield.
So when it came to improving Plainfield's system I thought it was a good idea to speak with a municipality with a platform that is both efficient and effective. So I made it a point to have a conversation with the Chief inspector of New Brunswick, NJ. I chose New Brunswick because it has suburban and urban parts that make up their town just like Plainfield. In addition, I spoke with many of Plainfield's own inspectors to get their input on the matter. They all agreed that Plainfield needs to change the current code on the books and reduce the multitude of items the seller is required to complete before the certificate of compliance can be issued. The code should require that the subject property is safe to live in and is structurally sound. This would speed up the transaction process and free up our inspectors to go after the real violators of code enforcement. As your councilman, I would push for an ordinance to change the current code on the books, effectively limiting the scope and responsibilities of the inspectors. This solution is good for investors as well as home buyers and sellers.
Last night I stated my support for increasing the numbers of code enforcement inspectors. My opponent thinks we don't need more inspectors. I disagree. I stand behind my position and here's why. When it comes to code enforcement the department is woefully understaffed. When it comes to things like stacking, overcrowding and unauthorized building and maintenance we need more resources to enforce the rules that protect the integrity of our community. We have had multiple fires because of these unchecked violations. Imagine if you live on a quiet street in the Sleepy Hollow area. Your neighbor moves and rents their old house to a very nice family. At first all is well. Then violations begin to mount. Excessive trash makes it obvious that too many people are now occupying that dwelling. Who do you call for this kind of problem? The code enforcement division, but due to their lack of manpower they can't stay on top of things like this and believe me this is occurring all across the city. Cable wires running out of windows supplying Comcast to the multiple dwellings that have been created in one single family home. Sometimes I ask myself does anyone else notice this or is it just me?
Guess what happens when we don't have the necessary manpower to enforce our own rules, homeowners get to a point where they can't take it anymore and move. This causes a ripple effect throughout that neighborhood because the property value of the remaining homeowner is now reduced. Now the remaining homeowners either deal with the new eyesore or pack up and leave themselves. Property taxes in some areas of our community are between 10-20k. Even if your not a homeowner code enforcement rules are there to protect the quality of life for those who rent as well. But homeowners are not going to live next to an eyesore paying those kind of taxes. If you think it can't happen in your neighborhood think again. Many of our seniors who can no longer afford to continue to pay our higher than ever taxes are moving and using their old homes for rental income.
In closing, properly staffed divisions is key to unit effectiveness. We need to change the mission of these divisions and redirect them away from homeowners with minor violations and focus on overt violators of the law. We need to incorporate technology to make these divisions both more effective and efficient which was a part of my campaign platform from day one. I think these changes will allow our municipal employees to satisfy the true mission of both the Code and Inspections divisions for the City of Plainfield.
Plainfield. Let's dare to be great!
I would like to thank all who came out and attended the community forum sponsored by the Crescent Avenue Association. I appreciate the time of all who made the event happen. I hope for this to be the start of many more opportunities to get people involved in the process.
Unfortunately I left my camcorder on the night before so to all I promised a youtube of the event I'm sorry, the battery was dead. But I will make your comments and concerns available via youtube very soon. The event was a success in my eyes. I stayed focused on improving our community's economy through investment and education. Bringing all of our residents into the process via proactive leadership was a theme of mine.
During the forum I introduced the idea of establishing an education/technology center in downtown Plainfield. It could be a consortium between Rutgers and other Universities willing to establish a remote site in Plainfield center. It could provide the first new high paying jobs this community has seen in a long time. Surrounded by 7 other cities it would bring dollars back into our economy. It would make Plainfield more competitive especially for those professionals that would like to teach in their community and spend more time closer to home. I think it would do alot to strengthen our community especially for families where stay-at-home Moms could become adjunct professors and still remain close to their children. It would allow our advanced high school students to take college level courses without needing a car. Keeping all the money they spend throughout the day within our community. As part of the concept we would include a business incubator that could be embraced by those who are not interested in higher education.
My vision also includes the use of MEP's Moblie Education Platforms. To bring education vans or platforms into the communities that need them most. It would increase parental involvement and could also be used for things like workshops that are so badly needed in some of our most economically challenged areas. This is an cost effective way of advancing education for our children. Excellence is something we must demand and expect. Education is a great place to start.
Yes, this could be Plainfield. a center of technology and education. Let's dare to be great.
--Tony Rucker--
The following is a link I provided in an earlier post. New concepts in urban development. I think there are a few things we can learn ,yes, even from the Europeans. The event attended by leading economist and social theorist was held at the Hague, The Netherlands in October of 2006 http://www.reurba.org/reports9/film-experts.html
Unfortunately I left my camcorder on the night before so to all I promised a youtube of the event I'm sorry, the battery was dead. But I will make your comments and concerns available via youtube very soon. The event was a success in my eyes. I stayed focused on improving our community's economy through investment and education. Bringing all of our residents into the process via proactive leadership was a theme of mine.
During the forum I introduced the idea of establishing an education/technology center in downtown Plainfield. It could be a consortium between Rutgers and other Universities willing to establish a remote site in Plainfield center. It could provide the first new high paying jobs this community has seen in a long time. Surrounded by 7 other cities it would bring dollars back into our economy. It would make Plainfield more competitive especially for those professionals that would like to teach in their community and spend more time closer to home. I think it would do alot to strengthen our community especially for families where stay-at-home Moms could become adjunct professors and still remain close to their children. It would allow our advanced high school students to take college level courses without needing a car. Keeping all the money they spend throughout the day within our community. As part of the concept we would include a business incubator that could be embraced by those who are not interested in higher education.
My vision also includes the use of MEP's Moblie Education Platforms. To bring education vans or platforms into the communities that need them most. It would increase parental involvement and could also be used for things like workshops that are so badly needed in some of our most economically challenged areas. This is an cost effective way of advancing education for our children. Excellence is something we must demand and expect. Education is a great place to start.
Yes, this could be Plainfield. a center of technology and education. Let's dare to be great.
--Tony Rucker--
The following is a link I provided in an earlier post. New concepts in urban development. I think there are a few things we can learn ,yes, even from the Europeans. The event attended by leading economist and social theorist was held at the Hague, The Netherlands in October of 2006 http://www.reurba.org/reports9/film-experts.html
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Sorry PToday. I'm Staying on message.
Dan, the residents of Plainfield want problems solved and potholes fixed. They want their leaves taken away and their streets litter free. They want a stronger local economy and effective leadership. But I guess your last post is part of the sizzle that campaign season is made up of.
I fugured that some of my policy positions would be challenged but no its the old ad hominem attack. First why you would try to impinge on my character I have no idea but for the record I have not removed any signs from anyplace. Nor have I instructed my followers to remove any Storch signs. Frankly I doubt Mr. Storch or the people that live in our neighborhood would think I would be capable of such dirty tactics.
For starters you sent me an e-mail stating that Cory Storch indicated his signs were being removed from homeowners yards. Maybe you should have e-mailed those homeowners first.
Tony -- I've been told that Cory signs are being taken down -- including one on the lawn of his longtime treasurer. This is a perennial problem, but I can assure you Cory is not taking any of your signs down. I hope you will check this out with your supporters and put the kibosh on it if any of them are getting carried away. Above-board campaigns don't need this kind of tactic.
Best, Dan
I read your e-mail and immediately called you about this allegation. I left a message asking you to call me back. That was Friday. As of today, which is Wednesday I haven't heard from you. No phone call. No e-mail. I guess no interest in hearing what I have to say on the matter.
Do you know that I was one of the first residents to sign Mr. Storch's petition required for candidacy? I believe in the integrity of the process, so taking down signs... that wouldn't be I.
As far as the Harvest Radio show... I hope all the candidates get a chance to make their views known including Mr. Storch. I think the show would help Plainfield pick the better candidate. Anyway no feelings hurt here, so if you have any questions call me at 908-472-9421.
Now to all Plainfield residents, I encourage you to take few minutes to review the previous posts of each candidates blogs or the various issues that concern our community. Mr. Storch is the incumbent so his record and the impact his tenure has had on the conditions in our community should also be considered. Solutions are the key. Anyone can restate the obvious. At the end of the day its about results and effective leadership. That's what people remember.
Look forward to seeing you this evening. I hope to prove I am worthy of your confidence and ultimately your vote.
Find out more at http://www.tonyrucker.com/
I fugured that some of my policy positions would be challenged but no its the old ad hominem attack. First why you would try to impinge on my character I have no idea but for the record I have not removed any signs from anyplace. Nor have I instructed my followers to remove any Storch signs. Frankly I doubt Mr. Storch or the people that live in our neighborhood would think I would be capable of such dirty tactics.
For starters you sent me an e-mail stating that Cory Storch indicated his signs were being removed from homeowners yards. Maybe you should have e-mailed those homeowners first.
Tony -- I've been told that Cory signs are being taken down -- including one on the lawn of his longtime treasurer. This is a perennial problem, but I can assure you Cory is not taking any of your signs down. I hope you will check this out with your supporters and put the kibosh on it if any of them are getting carried away. Above-board campaigns don't need this kind of tactic.
Best, Dan
I read your e-mail and immediately called you about this allegation. I left a message asking you to call me back. That was Friday. As of today, which is Wednesday I haven't heard from you. No phone call. No e-mail. I guess no interest in hearing what I have to say on the matter.
Do you know that I was one of the first residents to sign Mr. Storch's petition required for candidacy? I believe in the integrity of the process, so taking down signs... that wouldn't be I.
As far as the Harvest Radio show... I hope all the candidates get a chance to make their views known including Mr. Storch. I think the show would help Plainfield pick the better candidate. Anyway no feelings hurt here, so if you have any questions call me at 908-472-9421.
Now to all Plainfield residents, I encourage you to take few minutes to review the previous posts of each candidates blogs or the various issues that concern our community. Mr. Storch is the incumbent so his record and the impact his tenure has had on the conditions in our community should also be considered. Solutions are the key. Anyone can restate the obvious. At the end of the day its about results and effective leadership. That's what people remember.
Look forward to seeing you this evening. I hope to prove I am worthy of your confidence and ultimately your vote.
Find out more at http://www.tonyrucker.com/
Community Forum Tonight! May 30th
Wednesday. May 30. 7 PM. Ward 2 Council Candidate Forum: Rucker & Storch. Sponsor: Crescent Area Neighborhood Association. At the Plainfield Public Library, 8th Street and Park Avenue. All are invited.
I encourage all to attend. Be sure to tell your friends and neighbors. Come early and submit your questions and concerns about our city. I hope all your questions are answered. If not I will be available to be sure they get answered. I hope to show I have the character, experience and passion to change Plainfield for the better. Strong leadership in the 2nd ward can make a difference.
If you would like to give your opinion or find out more on where I stand on any issue give me a call at 908-472-9421.
Find out more at http://www.tonyrucker.com/
I encourage all to attend. Be sure to tell your friends and neighbors. Come early and submit your questions and concerns about our city. I hope all your questions are answered. If not I will be available to be sure they get answered. I hope to show I have the character, experience and passion to change Plainfield for the better. Strong leadership in the 2nd ward can make a difference.
If you would like to give your opinion or find out more on where I stand on any issue give me a call at 908-472-9421.
Find out more at http://www.tonyrucker.com/
A response to all your comments.
I will be responding to all comments left on my blogsite. Whether they be anonymous or not you deserve to be heard. Look for that after tomorrows debate. If you don't see your comment after a day or so you can always call and remind me to post it. That's with Caller ID blocked of course!
You can reach me at 908-472-9421.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
You can reach me at 908-472-9421.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
The Best and Brightest we have to offer.
This country is at war in Iraq. With each day another life filled with the hopes of the previous generation is cut short. Yesterday morning I attended the Memorial Day Event held at the corner of Watchung & 7th Street in Plainfield. I watched grizzled-old veterans who defended our country pay tribute to those who had made the ultimate sacrifice. Memorial Day to some means the start of the Summer. For others a long 3-day weekend. But when you think that many of the young men and women that have died (and are dying) serving our country were some of the best and brightest America had to offer it should give the holiday real meaning to all of us.
Imagine your son or daughter filled with life's possibilities having that light dimmed forever. Many experts say that the situation in Iraq is at a crisis point. Many including the President call the situation unacceptable. As a former U.S Marine I appreciate and respect the sacrifice of those brave souls, many just barely out of high school.
But Plainfield has a crisis of its own when it comes to its children and young adults and it is just as unacceptable. Too many of our best and brightest can't see success in their future. Too many are growing up without a strong desire to learn. To many have a perception of a future that is fatalistic. This is a crisis. Our crisis. Who crys out for our children? Many have made it their life's work to educate and mold these children into success stories. But we must do more. This community must make improving the lives and opportunities for our children a top priority.
To this end I a proponent of a multi-generational strategy which leverages the talent and experience of our seniors and retired professionals. By creating a platform where mentoring and internships become a regular component of our children's educational experience. Giving children an upclose look at real world professional applications. This connection between children and their elders has been lost almost entirely. It would bring our community back to a place it used to be. When the elders knew the names of the children in their community and had the relationship to make a difference.
My desire as councilman of the 2nd ward would to be to work with others professionals especially the Board of Education to implement new strategies that make programs like this available to our young people. We as a community must appreciate the gravity of the situation for our children and young adults. They look to us for leadership. They look to us for answers to problems they can't solve. Understand this, everything from our property value to our local economy is affected by the the quality of the educational opportunities made available to our young people.
This is our crisis Plainfield. We must succeed. Failure is not an option. Many of us were blessed with the opportunity of a good education supported by caring adults. Let's make it our mission to make sure the children of this community get that same chance.
--Tony Rucker--
Imagine your son or daughter filled with life's possibilities having that light dimmed forever. Many experts say that the situation in Iraq is at a crisis point. Many including the President call the situation unacceptable. As a former U.S Marine I appreciate and respect the sacrifice of those brave souls, many just barely out of high school.
But Plainfield has a crisis of its own when it comes to its children and young adults and it is just as unacceptable. Too many of our best and brightest can't see success in their future. Too many are growing up without a strong desire to learn. To many have a perception of a future that is fatalistic. This is a crisis. Our crisis. Who crys out for our children? Many have made it their life's work to educate and mold these children into success stories. But we must do more. This community must make improving the lives and opportunities for our children a top priority.
To this end I a proponent of a multi-generational strategy which leverages the talent and experience of our seniors and retired professionals. By creating a platform where mentoring and internships become a regular component of our children's educational experience. Giving children an upclose look at real world professional applications. This connection between children and their elders has been lost almost entirely. It would bring our community back to a place it used to be. When the elders knew the names of the children in their community and had the relationship to make a difference.
My desire as councilman of the 2nd ward would to be to work with others professionals especially the Board of Education to implement new strategies that make programs like this available to our young people. We as a community must appreciate the gravity of the situation for our children and young adults. They look to us for leadership. They look to us for answers to problems they can't solve. Understand this, everything from our property value to our local economy is affected by the the quality of the educational opportunities made available to our young people.
This is our crisis Plainfield. We must succeed. Failure is not an option. Many of us were blessed with the opportunity of a good education supported by caring adults. Let's make it our mission to make sure the children of this community get that same chance.
--Tony Rucker--
Friday, May 25, 2007
Its feeding time. Again.
Both of my parents are from South Carolina. So when I was little I used to visit my uncle's farm filled with every animal you could imagine. He had lots of hogs and he would often call for them to get in the barn in the evening. But they would ignore him. He would eventually pick up a stick and start beating on their feeding trough. They appeared with a quickness jamming their snouts deep into the cornmeal. Once they had their fill, they were gone.
Sometimes that's how I feel some politicians are. Its only when the campaign season hits our concerns as a community seem to get through. But prior to that you can come and complain and complain about the same thing all to no avail. Resident after resident at council meetings saying this proposal as it is stated is not good for our community, all to no avail. Councilor Votes yes yes yes yes yes. But when a election roles around the soundness and validity of citizen positions are championed. All of a sudden the incumbent candidate becomes outspoken and begins offering solutions and proposals all of which nobody has ever heard proposed before. It's embarrassing. It's a charade and it's not strong leadership. We need consensus builders not consensus seekers on city council. We deserve better. It's time for change.
Sometimes that's how I feel some politicians are. Its only when the campaign season hits our concerns as a community seem to get through. But prior to that you can come and complain and complain about the same thing all to no avail. Resident after resident at council meetings saying this proposal as it is stated is not good for our community, all to no avail. Councilor Votes yes yes yes yes yes. But when a election roles around the soundness and validity of citizen positions are championed. All of a sudden the incumbent candidate becomes outspoken and begins offering solutions and proposals all of which nobody has ever heard proposed before. It's embarrassing. It's a charade and it's not strong leadership. We need consensus builders not consensus seekers on city council. We deserve better. It's time for change.
What is the purpose of Development? What's missing?
A person that I have a great deal of respect for stopped me this morning and asked why am I so hard on development. Which made me think if I had adequately explained my position on the matter. So I pose these questions...Why do towns and cities encourage development? Just what are we trying to accomplish in Plainfield? It appears the strategy is to get enough people within the downtown area to increase demand for businesses. Sounds reasonable enough. Let's dig a little deeper though. Let me ask you, that's right you, when is the last time you've been downtown? I asked someone that this morning and they laughed and said "not recently."
Just what do we want downtown to look like? Who will be the benefactors of this development? Is this driving development?
Will the average citizen of Plainfield see an increase in their standard of living after these projects materialize? I say again who will benefit? Why is it that you can drive around any of the surrounding cities without seeing any obvious areas dilapidation? But in Plainfield you can find it no problem. Let's be real. There are areas in this city that have been underdeveloped for many years. I assure you that this development frenzy will not be focusing on these peoples needs. We have seen these big plans dissapoint before. Let's talk about the Teppers or Park-Madison projects. This version of urban revitalization just doesn't work and will result in our city continuing to have concentrated areas of both poverty and wealth. Is that really the kind of city we want to live in?
When is the last time you and your family took a stroll downtown. Shopped downtown as a family? That's what I thought. Why is this the case? That indeed is the question. Until those issues are addressed it is unlikely that your family stroll through town center will occur any time soon. You see it is not a developers role to worry about socioeconomic prosperity for a community. That is the local government's responsibility and fundamentally its real purpose. As your councilman I know I can provide leadership in this area. I want to invest in the people of this community so they can add to the beauty of this city. In their dreams of owning a house, opening a business or opening a cultural center. There is a certain pride in ownership.
If the current development proposed included reopening our movie theater it would make me happy. If it included the establishment a major eatery it would make me clap. If it included a technical or cultural center it would make proud. That's what missing in all this development, something I hope someone else feels is missing. A soul. A purpose. Something that inspires. The soul of this city is hurting. People want to believe again. They want to feel good about the city that they love, that right now is not giving them any love back. Real economic development will give hope to the hopeless and make us proud.
Whether you're a bleeding-heart liberal or a die-hard conservative investing in the people of our community is simply sound economic strategy. It would improve overall per capita income, quality of life and improve the business environment throughout the city. Isn't this the real purpose of development? Isn't this want we want? So I say to development, YES! Absolutely!! But if we are serious about changing our city, development must include all the people of the community. If it did, that downtown family stroll could be happening sooner than you think. That's my dream for Plainfield. Always putting the priorities of the people before the priorities of the party. I just wonder sometimes if Mr. Storch has lost his way on this. I wonder.
Just what do we want downtown to look like? Who will be the benefactors of this development? Is this driving development?
Will the average citizen of Plainfield see an increase in their standard of living after these projects materialize? I say again who will benefit? Why is it that you can drive around any of the surrounding cities without seeing any obvious areas dilapidation? But in Plainfield you can find it no problem. Let's be real. There are areas in this city that have been underdeveloped for many years. I assure you that this development frenzy will not be focusing on these peoples needs. We have seen these big plans dissapoint before. Let's talk about the Teppers or Park-Madison projects. This version of urban revitalization just doesn't work and will result in our city continuing to have concentrated areas of both poverty and wealth. Is that really the kind of city we want to live in?
When is the last time you and your family took a stroll downtown. Shopped downtown as a family? That's what I thought. Why is this the case? That indeed is the question. Until those issues are addressed it is unlikely that your family stroll through town center will occur any time soon. You see it is not a developers role to worry about socioeconomic prosperity for a community. That is the local government's responsibility and fundamentally its real purpose. As your councilman I know I can provide leadership in this area. I want to invest in the people of this community so they can add to the beauty of this city. In their dreams of owning a house, opening a business or opening a cultural center. There is a certain pride in ownership.
If the current development proposed included reopening our movie theater it would make me happy. If it included the establishment a major eatery it would make me clap. If it included a technical or cultural center it would make proud. That's what missing in all this development, something I hope someone else feels is missing. A soul. A purpose. Something that inspires. The soul of this city is hurting. People want to believe again. They want to feel good about the city that they love, that right now is not giving them any love back. Real economic development will give hope to the hopeless and make us proud.
Whether you're a bleeding-heart liberal or a die-hard conservative investing in the people of our community is simply sound economic strategy. It would improve overall per capita income, quality of life and improve the business environment throughout the city. Isn't this the real purpose of development? Isn't this want we want? So I say to development, YES! Absolutely!! But if we are serious about changing our city, development must include all the people of the community. If it did, that downtown family stroll could be happening sooner than you think. That's my dream for Plainfield. Always putting the priorities of the people before the priorities of the party. I just wonder sometimes if Mr. Storch has lost his way on this. I wonder.
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Public Libraries. Never stop growing.
Tonight I will be a featured panelist of the Nubian Union at Plainfield Public Library. Come out as we discuss the issues within our community surrounded the powerful works of Helen M. Stummer. Hope to see you there. Program starts at 6:30PM.
"It is not sufficient to see and to know the beauty of a work. We must feel and be affected by it."
-Voltaire-
"It is not sufficient to see and to know the beauty of a work. We must feel and be affected by it."
-Voltaire-
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Upcoming Events to hear where I stand on the issues.
The following is a list of scheduled appearances that I will be making in the upcoming weeks prior to the election. If I've never had the chance to meet you please come out and give me your take on issues within your neighborhood and the City as a whole. I want to bring a new energy to our community that produces actual results instead of "future promises." Please come out or listen-in to learn more about the new heights and direction I want to see for Plainfield and the 2nd Ward.
Wednesday. May 23. 8 PM. City Council Business Meeting. City Council Chambers/Courthouse. Watchung Avenue and East 4th Street. Make you voice heard at tonights City Council Meeting.
Thursday. May 24. 6:30 - 8:30 PM. I will be a featured Panelist at the Nubian Union Meeting Sponsored by McDonald's. Plainfield Public Library. 8th Street at Park Avenue. FREE.
Wednesday. May 30. 7PM. Ward 2 Council Candidate Forum: Rucker & Storch. Sponsor: Crescent Area Neighborhood Ass'n. At the Plainfield Public Library, 8th Street and Park Avenue. All invited, regardless of party affiliation or registration status.
Monday. June 4. 1:30-2:30PM. The day before the June 5th election I am an invited guest speaking and broadcasting live on Harvest Radio 1070AM. Please tune in!!
Questions? Please reach me at 908-472-9421.
Thank you for your time and support.
--Tony Rucker--
Wednesday. May 23. 8 PM. City Council Business Meeting. City Council Chambers/Courthouse. Watchung Avenue and East 4th Street. Make you voice heard at tonights City Council Meeting.
Thursday. May 24. 6:30 - 8:30 PM. I will be a featured Panelist at the Nubian Union Meeting Sponsored by McDonald's. Plainfield Public Library. 8th Street at Park Avenue. FREE.
Wednesday. May 30. 7PM. Ward 2 Council Candidate Forum: Rucker & Storch. Sponsor: Crescent Area Neighborhood Ass'n. At the Plainfield Public Library, 8th Street and Park Avenue. All invited, regardless of party affiliation or registration status.
Monday. June 4. 1:30-2:30PM. The day before the June 5th election I am an invited guest speaking and broadcasting live on Harvest Radio 1070AM. Please tune in!!
Questions? Please reach me at 908-472-9421.
Thank you for your time and support.
--Tony Rucker--
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Downtown Strategy and what is possible.
Challenges and solutions. We can do this Plainfield!
Fact #1-
Plainfield is a beautiful town filled with many beautiful homes--for sale. There are more than 350 houses for sale for under 350K. 350K is also the projected price of units in the so called "Transit Village" strategy. This strategy would cause existing housing prices to fall and keep houses on the market even longer than they already are. We don't need more capacity. We all know that unsold houses eventually become overcrowded rentals. Overcrowded rentals eventually become overcrowded problems.
Solution-- Real economic development will require investment capital coming back into the city. Creating a platform for a major employer is the first step. I don't agree with the idea of tax abatements in most cases but there are exceptions to every rule. The exception would be if a company similar to Lucent or AT&T wanted to set up shop in Plainfield. The abatement would only be for a short span and the economic impact would send ripples through our local economy and housing market for years to come... A major employer would reduce the inventory of homes for sale and increase overall economic activity and reduce taxes on residential property tax owners. First steps investing real Code Enforcement and Technology infrastructure.
Fact #2
The idea that we need to bring in people from outside our community to save downtown Plainfield ignores the current residents in surrounding neighborhoods. The reason why downtown Plainfield has underperformed for many years is because of one simple reason. People who live in the surrounding suburbs for the most part do their shopping elsewhere. Its that simple and its a fact. The reason why so many don't shop downtown is not so simple. Addressing those underlying issues takes political guts and willingness to take criticism. Leaders don't seek consensus they build it.
Solution-- We need to concentrate investment in a specific area to establish area where the best of dining, entertainment and professional businesses can cluster. Mobile vendors that can concentrate in that area with more allowed for special events. It will allow for new products and services to be offered without the typical barriers to entry most businesses face. The key here is new people downtown. Eventually these vendors can go the way of brick and mortar further expanding the cluster.
Fact #3
With a projected job growth rate of a meager 1.4%, Plainfield's local economy isn't creating enough new jobs. Its why on any given day downtown you see too many young adults with seemingly too much time on their hands. This demographic is a key to our local economy because they tend to spend most of their disposable income in the community they live in unlike more affluent adults.
Solution--A downtown community/commercial center can be a hub of economic development. This can act as a place for larger town events we currently don't have the venue for. The technical element can be a cornerstone of continuing education and incubator for small business and entrepreneurs. All done with a visible police force to establish and maintain the business climate.
This is true economic growth. A corporate base, dining and entertainment, a community and technical center. These all add to the quality of life to the community as a whole. If this critical mass existed you wouldn't need to build a transit village you would be creating one with people who already love the city.
-Tony Rucker-
Fact #1-
Plainfield is a beautiful town filled with many beautiful homes--for sale. There are more than 350 houses for sale for under 350K. 350K is also the projected price of units in the so called "Transit Village" strategy. This strategy would cause existing housing prices to fall and keep houses on the market even longer than they already are. We don't need more capacity. We all know that unsold houses eventually become overcrowded rentals. Overcrowded rentals eventually become overcrowded problems.
Solution-- Real economic development will require investment capital coming back into the city. Creating a platform for a major employer is the first step. I don't agree with the idea of tax abatements in most cases but there are exceptions to every rule. The exception would be if a company similar to Lucent or AT&T wanted to set up shop in Plainfield. The abatement would only be for a short span and the economic impact would send ripples through our local economy and housing market for years to come... A major employer would reduce the inventory of homes for sale and increase overall economic activity and reduce taxes on residential property tax owners. First steps investing real Code Enforcement and Technology infrastructure.
Fact #2
The idea that we need to bring in people from outside our community to save downtown Plainfield ignores the current residents in surrounding neighborhoods. The reason why downtown Plainfield has underperformed for many years is because of one simple reason. People who live in the surrounding suburbs for the most part do their shopping elsewhere. Its that simple and its a fact. The reason why so many don't shop downtown is not so simple. Addressing those underlying issues takes political guts and willingness to take criticism. Leaders don't seek consensus they build it.
Solution-- We need to concentrate investment in a specific area to establish area where the best of dining, entertainment and professional businesses can cluster. Mobile vendors that can concentrate in that area with more allowed for special events. It will allow for new products and services to be offered without the typical barriers to entry most businesses face. The key here is new people downtown. Eventually these vendors can go the way of brick and mortar further expanding the cluster.
Fact #3
With a projected job growth rate of a meager 1.4%, Plainfield's local economy isn't creating enough new jobs. Its why on any given day downtown you see too many young adults with seemingly too much time on their hands. This demographic is a key to our local economy because they tend to spend most of their disposable income in the community they live in unlike more affluent adults.
Solution--A downtown community/commercial center can be a hub of economic development. This can act as a place for larger town events we currently don't have the venue for. The technical element can be a cornerstone of continuing education and incubator for small business and entrepreneurs. All done with a visible police force to establish and maintain the business climate.
This is true economic growth. A corporate base, dining and entertainment, a community and technical center. These all add to the quality of life to the community as a whole. If this critical mass existed you wouldn't need to build a transit village you would be creating one with people who already love the city.
-Tony Rucker-
Monday, May 21, 2007
Plainfield pushing the limits on density.
In my following post I will offer my position of the subject but for now...the following is a May 17th quote that was found on my opponents(current 2nd ward councilperson Cory Storch) blog site.
"Transit Village is a concept whose time has come, especially for a densely populated state like New Jersey. It means redirecting development away from our shrinking farmlands and green space and concentrating it where the infrastructure already exists - where the mass transit is, near shopping and jobs. In Plainfield, it means concentrating development around one or more train stations."
The current councilperson and I have two very different strategies on how to revitalize downtown Plainfield. He believes the transit village idea should be implemented in Plainfield. I must respectfully disagree. Let me explain why.
#1-
I appreciate the current councilors concern for green space in our more rural areas in New Jersey but frankly I'm concerned about the lack of green space for the members of my community. What about the additional waste created by these developments and how that impacts our ecosystem?
#2 -
Redirecting development away from our more rural areas of the State to Plainfield where the infrastructure already exist? Yes we have the transit line but our municipal infrastructure also includes: transportation roadways, police and hospitals all of which are operating without the necessary resources to perform effectively already. How many times have you complained about roads or traffic safety this week?
#3 -
Concentrating development around one or more train stations near shopping and jobs. Plainfield's projected job growth rate is a meager 1.4%. I'm just wondering where the current shopping and jobs options exist.
The transit village is a good concept but a bad idea for Plainfield. Do we really want to make the city even more dense?
It all comes down to what kind of city we want to live in. Many of us enjoy to walk through our neighborhoods or taking a drive to Dairy Queen in the evening. But all of us know that our Police are stretched thin when it comes to patrols as it is. Traffic safety is not only an issue going through our intersections but right in front of our house these days. Transit Villages would inevitably result in even more motor vehicles speeding through our neighborhoods and that is why I am surprised my opponent supports the concept. The financial implications to our city are huge considering adding an additional 250 children to our school system would cost a whopping 3.25 million dollars. Can our school system handle this? It's simply a bad idea.
Please come out for the May 30th community forum held downstairs in the public library. Both candidates were offered an invitation. I look forward to being there. I appreciate your support and your vote on June 5th.
This community forum will be held from 7-9pm.
To find out more call 908-472-9421 or at www.tonyrucker.com
You can also e-mail me at www.tony@tonyrucker.com
Next Part III-Downtown Development
"Transit Village is a concept whose time has come, especially for a densely populated state like New Jersey. It means redirecting development away from our shrinking farmlands and green space and concentrating it where the infrastructure already exists - where the mass transit is, near shopping and jobs. In Plainfield, it means concentrating development around one or more train stations."
The current councilperson and I have two very different strategies on how to revitalize downtown Plainfield. He believes the transit village idea should be implemented in Plainfield. I must respectfully disagree. Let me explain why.
#1-
I appreciate the current councilors concern for green space in our more rural areas in New Jersey but frankly I'm concerned about the lack of green space for the members of my community. What about the additional waste created by these developments and how that impacts our ecosystem?
#2 -
Redirecting development away from our more rural areas of the State to Plainfield where the infrastructure already exist? Yes we have the transit line but our municipal infrastructure also includes: transportation roadways, police and hospitals all of which are operating without the necessary resources to perform effectively already. How many times have you complained about roads or traffic safety this week?
#3 -
Concentrating development around one or more train stations near shopping and jobs. Plainfield's projected job growth rate is a meager 1.4%. I'm just wondering where the current shopping and jobs options exist.
The transit village is a good concept but a bad idea for Plainfield. Do we really want to make the city even more dense?
It all comes down to what kind of city we want to live in. Many of us enjoy to walk through our neighborhoods or taking a drive to Dairy Queen in the evening. But all of us know that our Police are stretched thin when it comes to patrols as it is. Traffic safety is not only an issue going through our intersections but right in front of our house these days. Transit Villages would inevitably result in even more motor vehicles speeding through our neighborhoods and that is why I am surprised my opponent supports the concept. The financial implications to our city are huge considering adding an additional 250 children to our school system would cost a whopping 3.25 million dollars. Can our school system handle this? It's simply a bad idea.
Please come out for the May 30th community forum held downstairs in the public library. Both candidates were offered an invitation. I look forward to being there. I appreciate your support and your vote on June 5th.
This community forum will be held from 7-9pm.
To find out more call 908-472-9421 or at www.tonyrucker.com
You can also e-mail me at www.tony@tonyrucker.com
Next Part III-Downtown Development
Saturday, May 19, 2007
"For the People By the People"
An elderly man I recently met on the campaign trail stopped me, looked me in the eye and asked me why I was running. I explained to him that I wanted to focus on economic development and cleaner streets but he didn't want to hear it. He asked me again this time putting his hand on my shoulder "why are you running son" and then smiled and walked away. I had been asked the question many times before but this time it wasn't the same. I'm a people person by nature but the experience was a friendly reminder that if you want to be an elected leader it starts with understanding and promoting the will of the people.
I have always wanted to champion causes for the greater good because it gave me a sense of purpose. People want an effective advocate, someone that represents their interests and not interest of the powers that be. It's a political balancing act-- to compromise without being compromised. The experience is very personal but painfully obvious to the public when that balance becomess out of wack. I want to be the councilor for the 2nd ward because I believe that the people of our city are crying out to be heard again. I want to work toward building a community that celebrates the excellence which is in all of us. Regardless of your address, race, culture, sexual orientation-- we all want the same things out of life. We want a community we can be proud of and the opportunity to make the next day better than the last. Cleary many of our most accomplished citizens are not an active part of our community. I want to change that. If we want to move this city forward we can no longer afford for that talent base to sit idly on the shelf .
A few months ago I went to a Westfield City Council meeting. Their council was discussing the upcoming FY 08' budget. It impressed me, as wealthy as that town is, that city used private citizens as a regular component of local government. The advice and participation of these experts who were all city residents was all done at no additional cost to the city. I have met many who have told me they want to get involved in our city but don't really see how. I want to bring people back into the process who currently may not feel welcomed. I will strive to be known for working hard on the issues that impact the lives of everyday Plainfielders. It's time to put the interest of Plainfield first and not the bank accounts of people who don't even live in this city. I believe I have the passion, the experience and leadership skills that can make a difference we can be proud of.
I hope I get a chance to see that man again so I can listen to what he has to say.
Friday, May 18, 2007
" A Change Gonna Come"
Part II
In Part I , I shared a different perspective concerning Urban development. It focused on how a city can encourage investment without losing control of the development process. Intelligent Urbanism was based on the ideal that the ultimate purpose of a city is to foster human development. I think it's time for us as citizens of this community to remind ourselves what the original purpose of government actually is. Government exist for the purpose of serving the needs and wishes of the people and to provide for the collective good of its citizens. This "Social Contract" is the foundation of modern democracy. Government does not exist nor should it exist to serve itself and I say this with all due respect to the members of the City Council.
Many of Plainfield's previous urban renewal projects were big on promises and short on delivery. The Teppers and Park-Madison projects are a reminder that we've seen this whole charade before and another shiny building will neither capture our imagination nor inspire us to reach for greatness. I don't mean to suggest that these projects don't serve the public in some fashion but when you look at how they were originally touted I think its fair to say they have been a financial disappointment to the city. Specifically in regards to the projected economic impact and tax revenue that was expected. Make no mistake, there is an opportunity cost associated with projects that don't meet their original financial objectives. Long after developers have left Plainfield our taxpayers will continue to pay for the results. Failed projects reduce the confidence and participation levels of even the most passionate citizen. It's a big reason why I feel that so few people even come to City council meetings. How good of a job has your current Councilperson done on keeping you informed on proposals that could ultimately have a huge impact on your quality of life?
As your Councilman I would support the following...
5 Fundamentals of Responsible Development
#1 All development proposals that reach the level of serious consideration by the council would require a feasibility study to be posted on local media outlets and the City's website. This would ensure the public receive full disclosure concerning any potential socioeconomic impact on our city.
#2 In order to induce investment we need to embrace technology and innovation as a municipality so residential, retail and commercial markets are operating at optimal efficiency. When markets are optimized it helps to expand our local economy.
#3 I believe developers should pay their fair share of the cost associated with any new development and should guarantee a certain percentage of the workforce comes from residents of Plainfield.
#4 We need a multi-generational mentor program that brings our Seniors and Retired Professionals together with our young people. This will not only strengthen our local economy but our sense of community.
#5 I would vote NO! on the current attempt to modify the language in the City's Master Plan to allow high density hubs of residential development to invade and replace parcels zoned for commercial purposes. In addition the so called "transit village strategy" would increase traffic flow which would undoubtedly result in more cars speeding through our neighborhoods.
Let's just use a little bit of common sense. Our police department is understaffed. The inspection division is scheduled to see a reduction in personnel this month. Lack of code enforcement has already led to several recent fires. The frequency of these fires puts additional pressure on our fire department. Look at the condition of our roads. We have million dollar homes with 10"deep potholes directly in front of them. We don't need more people right now what we need is more well paying jobs.
"It's been a long time coming--But I know a change is gonna come"
Look for part III on Saturday.
A)Why Economic Development is the answer for Plainfield.
B) I will be discussing why I do not support the transit village idea as it currently proposed.
If you have question or comments reach me at 908-472-9421
You also e-mail me at tony@tonyrucker.com
Find out more or ccontribute at http://www.tonyrucker.com/
I appreciate your time and Thank for you vote on June 5th!
In Part I , I shared a different perspective concerning Urban development. It focused on how a city can encourage investment without losing control of the development process. Intelligent Urbanism was based on the ideal that the ultimate purpose of a city is to foster human development. I think it's time for us as citizens of this community to remind ourselves what the original purpose of government actually is. Government exist for the purpose of serving the needs and wishes of the people and to provide for the collective good of its citizens. This "Social Contract" is the foundation of modern democracy. Government does not exist nor should it exist to serve itself and I say this with all due respect to the members of the City Council.
Many of Plainfield's previous urban renewal projects were big on promises and short on delivery. The Teppers and Park-Madison projects are a reminder that we've seen this whole charade before and another shiny building will neither capture our imagination nor inspire us to reach for greatness. I don't mean to suggest that these projects don't serve the public in some fashion but when you look at how they were originally touted I think its fair to say they have been a financial disappointment to the city. Specifically in regards to the projected economic impact and tax revenue that was expected. Make no mistake, there is an opportunity cost associated with projects that don't meet their original financial objectives. Long after developers have left Plainfield our taxpayers will continue to pay for the results. Failed projects reduce the confidence and participation levels of even the most passionate citizen. It's a big reason why I feel that so few people even come to City council meetings. How good of a job has your current Councilperson done on keeping you informed on proposals that could ultimately have a huge impact on your quality of life?
As your Councilman I would support the following...
5 Fundamentals of Responsible Development
#1 All development proposals that reach the level of serious consideration by the council would require a feasibility study to be posted on local media outlets and the City's website. This would ensure the public receive full disclosure concerning any potential socioeconomic impact on our city.
#2 In order to induce investment we need to embrace technology and innovation as a municipality so residential, retail and commercial markets are operating at optimal efficiency. When markets are optimized it helps to expand our local economy.
#3 I believe developers should pay their fair share of the cost associated with any new development and should guarantee a certain percentage of the workforce comes from residents of Plainfield.
#4 We need a multi-generational mentor program that brings our Seniors and Retired Professionals together with our young people. This will not only strengthen our local economy but our sense of community.
#5 I would vote NO! on the current attempt to modify the language in the City's Master Plan to allow high density hubs of residential development to invade and replace parcels zoned for commercial purposes. In addition the so called "transit village strategy" would increase traffic flow which would undoubtedly result in more cars speeding through our neighborhoods.
Let's just use a little bit of common sense. Our police department is understaffed. The inspection division is scheduled to see a reduction in personnel this month. Lack of code enforcement has already led to several recent fires. The frequency of these fires puts additional pressure on our fire department. Look at the condition of our roads. We have million dollar homes with 10"deep potholes directly in front of them. We don't need more people right now what we need is more well paying jobs.
"It's been a long time coming--But I know a change is gonna come"
Look for part III on Saturday.
A)Why Economic Development is the answer for Plainfield.
B) I will be discussing why I do not support the transit village idea as it currently proposed.
If you have question or comments reach me at 908-472-9421
You also e-mail me at tony@tonyrucker.com
Find out more or ccontribute at http://www.tonyrucker.com/
I appreciate your time and Thank for you vote on June 5th!
What's your opinion of the conditions of the 2nd Ward?
What exactly do you think of the present conditions within the 2nd ward ? If you live in the ward I want to know. Even if you don't I live within the ward I like to hear your opinion. Just in case your not sure the borders of the 2nd ward here they are.
Northern border- Intersection of Park Avenue/5th Street all the way to Terrill Road
Southern border-Intersection Randolph Road/Park Avenue all the way to Woodland Ave
Eastern border-Intersection of Terrill Road/George Street all the way to Cushing Ave
Western border- Intersection Randolph/Park Avenue all the way to 5th Street
It also includes the area between
the Intersection of Leland/George to Terrill/George
Intersection of Leland/Columbia to Terrill/Columbia
Intersection of Leland/North Ave to Terrill/North Ave
Everything between Intersection Terrill/Cushing and Leland/Cushing
If you have questions or comments I'd like to hear from you at 908-472-9421
I've noticed a few things. Look for my post this evening.
Thanks for visiting my site. My e-mail address is tony@tonyrucker.com
If you have questions or comments you can reach me directly at 908-4729421
To learn more or give your support please visit www.tonyrucker.com
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Can "Intelligent Urbanism" make Plainfield a better place to live?
Part I
Plainfield is in the midst of considering several development proposals. Urban redevelopment is a term that some of us have become very familiar with as of late. Not knowing what its means could be dangerous to you if your are in its path of construction. Growth, economic stagnation, blight and finally "redevelopment" are a regular part of America's cities cycle of growth and decline. This ongoing attempt to revitalize communities that were once economic powerhouses is certainly a worthy cause. But maybe just maybe urban communities are ready to concede that after over 50 years of towing the line the old revitalization strategies simply don't work. When we look at the statistics the numbers just don't lie. Higher than average levels of poverty and crime combined with lower standard test scores in nearly all of America's urban school systems. These socioeconomic realities are the alarm going off that no one seems to hear. We must act with a sense of urgency. We must change course or expect the same results.
There is much to learn or at least consider from our "friends" across the pond. Intelligent Urbanism is essentially a new set of priorities based on the idea that buildings and machines should be built around people and instead of vice versa. Some of Europe's cities are hundreds even thousands of years old. They have been doing this whole "city thing" for a while now. Cities across Europe are now focusing on how to allow and encourage investment without losing control of the redevelopment process. Their belief is that a city's ultimate purpose and function is to encourage human development. This is done by establishing the requisites that support and improve quality of life factors such as... strong job growth, a healthy environment, access to parks and recreation and a high quality education.
The following link will connect you to a Economic conference that was held at The Hague, The Netherlands, in November of 2006. It shows various Urban Planners and Economists sharing what they see as the positive aspects of "intelligent urbanism" and why it is being implemented in urban centers all across Europe. Some participants do not speak English but those portions are close captioned.
Click the link and tell me what you think!
http://www.reurba.org/reports9/film-experts.html
Part II to follow.
Plainfield is in the midst of considering several development proposals. Urban redevelopment is a term that some of us have become very familiar with as of late. Not knowing what its means could be dangerous to you if your are in its path of construction. Growth, economic stagnation, blight and finally "redevelopment" are a regular part of America's cities cycle of growth and decline. This ongoing attempt to revitalize communities that were once economic powerhouses is certainly a worthy cause. But maybe just maybe urban communities are ready to concede that after over 50 years of towing the line the old revitalization strategies simply don't work. When we look at the statistics the numbers just don't lie. Higher than average levels of poverty and crime combined with lower standard test scores in nearly all of America's urban school systems. These socioeconomic realities are the alarm going off that no one seems to hear. We must act with a sense of urgency. We must change course or expect the same results.
There is much to learn or at least consider from our "friends" across the pond. Intelligent Urbanism is essentially a new set of priorities based on the idea that buildings and machines should be built around people and instead of vice versa. Some of Europe's cities are hundreds even thousands of years old. They have been doing this whole "city thing" for a while now. Cities across Europe are now focusing on how to allow and encourage investment without losing control of the redevelopment process. Their belief is that a city's ultimate purpose and function is to encourage human development. This is done by establishing the requisites that support and improve quality of life factors such as... strong job growth, a healthy environment, access to parks and recreation and a high quality education.
The following link will connect you to a Economic conference that was held at The Hague, The Netherlands, in November of 2006. It shows various Urban Planners and Economists sharing what they see as the positive aspects of "intelligent urbanism" and why it is being implemented in urban centers all across Europe. Some participants do not speak English but those portions are close captioned.
Click the link and tell me what you think!
http://www.reurba.org/reports9/film-experts.html
Part II to follow.
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Good governance
Whether it be our household or our city the standards we keep say alot about who we are. Collectively over time we establish what are considered to be accepted practices. It's amazing what we have come to accept these days. We need to reestablish what made our city so great and to do this we need a change in course. When I look at some of the conditions within our beloved city I wonder how others feel about what they see. Do they turn their heads or simply ignore all the things that are so obviously wrong?
A city much like your house is built on systems that all work together. The components of that system are its human capital and physical capital, its people and its machines. With a budget over 65 million dollars we must find the will to invest in our infrastructure and move Plainfield forward. That means a establishing a modern technology platform supported by well trained employees. Without these two things the municipality will not be able to efficiently deliver essential services to its residents. This means backing all of our municipal employees with resources they need to get their jobs done. Innovation can keep our municipality competitive and enhance our ability to attract and retain investment dollars for our local economy.
It doesn't take 4 years to get the roads clean or a pothole filled. Meeting with people throughout our community a common complaint was the perceived lack of information provided to the public about capital improvement projects, general overall maintenance and street cleaning schedules. As your 2nd ward Councilman I will work closely with these department heads to ensure our community gets the information and attention it deserves.
A city much like your house is built on systems that all work together. The components of that system are its human capital and physical capital, its people and its machines. With a budget over 65 million dollars we must find the will to invest in our infrastructure and move Plainfield forward. That means a establishing a modern technology platform supported by well trained employees. Without these two things the municipality will not be able to efficiently deliver essential services to its residents. This means backing all of our municipal employees with resources they need to get their jobs done. Innovation can keep our municipality competitive and enhance our ability to attract and retain investment dollars for our local economy.
It doesn't take 4 years to get the roads clean or a pothole filled. Meeting with people throughout our community a common complaint was the perceived lack of information provided to the public about capital improvement projects, general overall maintenance and street cleaning schedules. As your 2nd ward Councilman I will work closely with these department heads to ensure our community gets the information and attention it deserves.
Sunday, May 13, 2007
On Mother's Day
My grandfather was born in Lugoff, S.C. He often talked about how being born up north kept me from appreciating how blessed I truly was. He always use to tell me that I could be born a thousand times and not end up having a mother like mine. He was beyond right. What a blessing to have something so beautiful in your life. Is there anything on the planet that compares to the smile from your mother? I don't think there is a stronger bond in the world. When I was a boy I remember watching her prepare for church meticulously. She would finish her hair iron my clothes and then tell me to go in her pocketbook and get two dollars for Sunday offering. Every Sunday she would softly suggest to my father that he go with us, all to no avail.
To maintain that level of commitment and consistency for a life-time has to be enormously intimidating. Always doing the right thing and saying the right thing when I'm sure at times she wanted to throw her hands up in disgust. That has never happened and 'till this day my mother has never disappointed me. Not once. So to me setting aside one day is not enough for all the things that she and other mothers like her do, seen and unseen. So to honor her I do my best and I try walk as close to her example as I can. I called this Sunday morning and she was preparing f0r Sunday service along with my father. What a beautiful thing indeed.
To maintain that level of commitment and consistency for a life-time has to be enormously intimidating. Always doing the right thing and saying the right thing when I'm sure at times she wanted to throw her hands up in disgust. That has never happened and 'till this day my mother has never disappointed me. Not once. So to me setting aside one day is not enough for all the things that she and other mothers like her do, seen and unseen. So to honor her I do my best and I try walk as close to her example as I can. I called this Sunday morning and she was preparing f0r Sunday service along with my father. What a beautiful thing indeed.
Friday, May 11, 2007
An introduction...
Hello Plainfield. My name is James A. Rucker but my friends call me "Tony". I am a Democrat and a candidate for the 2nd ward seat on the Plainfield City Council. My family and I live on Berkeley Avenue not too far from Cook School. My wife to-be was actually a student there once upon a time. Delya has been a real trooper on the campaign team and I wanted to publicly thank her for her hard work and her can-do spirit. I would also like to give special thanks to my Marine Corps buddy Kelly for getting my website up and running. Great job! Finally I want to thank all my neighbors and supporters throughout the 2nd ward for giving me the encouragement to run and the resources to win. I really appreciate it. Thanks.
Welcome to my blogsite! I hope that the discourse found here can help to move the city forward in some small way. I plan to be open and honest about my feelings on all topics and concerns that are offered concerning Plainfield and beyond. I am confident this platform will help those who visit understand what my vision is for the city and the 2nd ward in particular. Some have cautioned me about the idea of having a blog and being so specific on the issues. I want my positions to be known without ambiguity. I'm prepared to stand behind what I believe in. For the record, I will substantiate my positions when challenged and admit when and if I'm wrong but I will never be afraid of giving my own opinion. This platform will illustrate the positions I hold versus the record and current positions of my opponent. As a corporate professional and former United States Marine I've established a history of strong and decisive leadership. I hope to show how being a consensus builder versus a consensus seeker can move us to new heights.
We have enormous talent in every corner of this city. It's time to get all that talent off the bench. We need to leverage the experience of our retired professionals and the wisdom of our seniors. A multi-generational strategy can make all of us winners especially our young people. We need real economic development in our beloved city. With a projected job growth rate of 1.4%, the city is not creating enough new jobs for its high school graduates and young adults. We must do better and we can.
If you would like to find out more or offer your support visit my website at http://www.tonyrucker.com/ . You can reach me directly at 908-472-9421 or e-mail us at tony@tonyrucker.com . Thanks to all that have given their time and support.
Welcome to my blogsite! I hope that the discourse found here can help to move the city forward in some small way. I plan to be open and honest about my feelings on all topics and concerns that are offered concerning Plainfield and beyond. I am confident this platform will help those who visit understand what my vision is for the city and the 2nd ward in particular. Some have cautioned me about the idea of having a blog and being so specific on the issues. I want my positions to be known without ambiguity. I'm prepared to stand behind what I believe in. For the record, I will substantiate my positions when challenged and admit when and if I'm wrong but I will never be afraid of giving my own opinion. This platform will illustrate the positions I hold versus the record and current positions of my opponent. As a corporate professional and former United States Marine I've established a history of strong and decisive leadership. I hope to show how being a consensus builder versus a consensus seeker can move us to new heights.
We have enormous talent in every corner of this city. It's time to get all that talent off the bench. We need to leverage the experience of our retired professionals and the wisdom of our seniors. A multi-generational strategy can make all of us winners especially our young people. We need real economic development in our beloved city. With a projected job growth rate of 1.4%, the city is not creating enough new jobs for its high school graduates and young adults. We must do better and we can.
If you would like to find out more or offer your support visit my website at http://www.tonyrucker.com/ . You can reach me directly at 908-472-9421 or e-mail us at tony@tonyrucker.com . Thanks to all that have given their time and support.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
